Grow your crypto and gold tax-free with iTrustCapital IRA — no monthly fees, and get a $100 bonus when you fund your account.
https://www.itrustcapital.com/go/savvy-finance
For years, Bitcoin investors relied on one simple framework: the 4-year cycle.
Every halving reduced new supply, demand increased, and Bitcoin entered another explosive bull market.
But this cycle was different.
Despite unprecedented institutional adoption, the launch of Bitcoin ETFs, corporate treasury accumulation, and growing global acceptance, Bitcoin failed to deliver the kind of parabolic move many investors expected.
So what changed?
In this video, macro analyst Lyn Alden explains why the traditional 4-year cycle may no longer be the most important factor driving Bitcoin's price.
Instead, she points to a much larger force that many investors have overlooked: long-term Bitcoin holders and OG whales distributing massive amounts of supply into growing institutional demand.
We break down:
✔ Why Lyn Alden believes the 4-year cycle is losing relevance
✔ The hidden impact of OG Bitcoin holders selling into strength
✔ Why Bitcoin's annual supply growth matters less than ever
✔ How AI stocks are competing with Bitcoin for investor capital
✔ Why institutions continue accumulating despite market volatility
✔ The difference between Bitcoin and stablecoins
✔ Why stablecoins could reach trillions of dollars in market capitalization
✔ What Bitcoin's ownership transfer means for future bull markets
✔ Why the next Bitcoin cycle could look completely different from previous ones
As Bitcoin matures into a global monetary asset, the battle between long-term holders taking profits and institutions accumulating supply may become the most important dynamic in the entire market.
Could this explain why Bitcoin struggled to reach the extreme price targets many expected?
And what happens when the OG sellers finally run out of coins?
Watch until the end to hear Lyn Alden's complete analysis.
https://www.itrustcapital.com/go/savvy-finance
For years, Bitcoin investors relied on one simple framework: the 4-year cycle.
Every halving reduced new supply, demand increased, and Bitcoin entered another explosive bull market.
But this cycle was different.
Despite unprecedented institutional adoption, the launch of Bitcoin ETFs, corporate treasury accumulation, and growing global acceptance, Bitcoin failed to deliver the kind of parabolic move many investors expected.
So what changed?
In this video, macro analyst Lyn Alden explains why the traditional 4-year cycle may no longer be the most important factor driving Bitcoin's price.
Instead, she points to a much larger force that many investors have overlooked: long-term Bitcoin holders and OG whales distributing massive amounts of supply into growing institutional demand.
We break down:
✔ Why Lyn Alden believes the 4-year cycle is losing relevance
✔ The hidden impact of OG Bitcoin holders selling into strength
✔ Why Bitcoin's annual supply growth matters less than ever
✔ How AI stocks are competing with Bitcoin for investor capital
✔ Why institutions continue accumulating despite market volatility
✔ The difference between Bitcoin and stablecoins
✔ Why stablecoins could reach trillions of dollars in market capitalization
✔ What Bitcoin's ownership transfer means for future bull markets
✔ Why the next Bitcoin cycle could look completely different from previous ones
As Bitcoin matures into a global monetary asset, the battle between long-term holders taking profits and institutions accumulating supply may become the most important dynamic in the entire market.
Could this explain why Bitcoin struggled to reach the extreme price targets many expected?
And what happens when the OG sellers finally run out of coins?
Watch until the end to hear Lyn Alden's complete analysis.
- Категория
- Криптовалюты
Комментариев нет.
